Judge berzon asked the most direct questions, sifting through the muck of Idahos nonsensical argument about children needing to be raised by their biological parents. But heterosexual men and women arent going to enter into same-sex marriages. So, whats the issue? Idaho was trying to avoid the reality that what the state wants to do is not really create a situation where kids are raised by their biological moms and dads, but just ban gays from marrying. These are two very different and clearly unrelated things. But the message of the man-woman marriage is that we need to create a stable bond that is in the best interests of the child, argued the Idaho attorney. Huh, judge berzon wondered. How is it, she asked, supportive of stable marriages and a benefit to children to have them raised outside of supportive same-sex marriages rather than inside supportive same-sex marriages?
The, last, leaf, summary analysis from LitCharts The creators
Some of the arguments and essay much of the tone were different this time around. The judges questioning was direct and they expressed a similar, though less visible, frustration with the misdirection and misleading statements from the anti-equality attorneys as Judge posner. The tone of the hearing suggested that marriage equality supporters are finally out of the closet, following a tidal wave of an emerging consensus of the legitimacy and morality of marriage freedom for all. A summary and analysis follows, after the jump, this is not the first time marriage equality came before the ninth Circuit. In fact, it was Judge reinhardt (right) who, along with two other judges, heard the appeal of the Prop 8 decision and after a delay involving the supreme court of California, issued a narrow decision affirming Prop 8 unconstitutional. The decision was limited to california because it argued that the reason why Prop 8 was unconstitutional was not because banning gays from marrying in general violated the Equal Protection or due process Clauses, but rather because the taking away of rights, as Prop. In re marriage cases, violated the rights of gay californians. The decisions narrowness was based on pretzel-like reasoning, but makes sense in context: as i argued before, judge reinhardt wanted to offer the supreme court a way to support marriage equality without going too far ahead of public opinion. Today, there is no such concern. It makes sense that the argumentand the decisionwould sound different.
Judge berzon can hear just fine; its just that she had never heard anyone make such a ridiculous claim before today. The rest of the hearing followed similarly. Judge Stephen reinhardt, a carter-appointee and liberal leader of the appellate courts, was joined by judge berzon, a sharp-minded progressive appointed by President Clinton, and Judge robert gould, another Clinton appointee, in a nearly two-hour long interrogation of attorneys from Idaho and nevada that may. It also brought marriage equality full circle. Judge reinhardt was the judge that wrote the first decision from a federal appellate court on marriage equality, affirming District, judge vaughn Walkers pioneering rejection of Californias Prop. We all know how proposal that case turned out. And we know whats happened since: a supreme court decision. Windsor striking down the defense of Marriage Act and a long streak of pro-marriage equality decisions from the lower federal courts, including several appellate courts. Yesterdays hearing reminded us how far we have really come.
Nasri's central wanderings can, at times, leave man City exposed against dangerous counter attacking teams but Nasri, and Man City, are at their best when the Frenchman plays in close proximity to thesis silva. It's a fearsome duo to defend against for both players posses the feet, the passing range, the ability to never give the ball away and tremendously high panic thresholds in the congested final third. Facing a player with those attributes is mighty difficult for defenses. Facing two of those players who decide to play the majority of the game within ten yards of each other is nigh on impossible to quell for the full 90 minutes. A dominant performance in a pressure game. Ninth Circuit Panel eviscerates What's Left of Anti-Equality Arguments: a summary and Analysis. By, ari ezra waldman, a soft-spoken attorney representing Idaho started his states anti-marriage equality argument by suggesting that allowing gays to marry violates the bonding right of children that they will be raised by their biological mothers and fathers. It took judge marsha berzon just 15 seconds to ask her first question: What is that word youre using before right'?
City enjoyed an early flourish in the first fifteen minutes, then a quiet spell before consistently registering shots from around the 40th minutes mark. Villa, in turn, were awfully quiet: more unable than unwilling to attempt any serious number of shots. Shot Positions, image from m 6 of City's 18 shots came from outside the area with the rest clustered around the penalty spot. Despite villa's deep, shelled defense city were patient and able to break through, or pass behind, the wall of Villa shirts and fashion quality shooting opportunities. This image is pulled from m and it shows the average position of the man City players when on the ball (not sure how they factor in subs, i guess they are all rolled into the one position). Kompany played sweeper, demichelis as the ball carrying distributor with Garcia holding. This allowed the fullbacks - kolarov and Zabaleta - to really push and provide width and ball support in the final third of the pitch. Milner stretched the pitch, both horizontally and vertically, by staying so wide and high, whilst Nasri (left wing) and Silva buzzed around dzeko.
The, last, leaf, summary and brief comment
Remember: Abuse of the m image system may result in you being banned from uploading images or from the entire site so, play nice and respect the rules! Man City were pretty good in their patient, and eventually dominant, win at home to Aston Villa last night. Below are the box scores from that win that leaves Man City just a point short of a 2nd pl title in 3 years. Basic Numbers, numbers pulled from. Across the board Man City were pretty much dominant over the opposition: pass volume, pass success and most importantly, shots. Shots Battle, the above chart shows when the two teams registered their shot attempts.
The figures had already begun to appear quite unrecognizable. In the 18th century, a large curtain had been erected to protect it, but this only made it worse due to the moisture and water it trapped. The first attempt at restoration was made in the early 1700s, but this did not go well. Around fifty years later, this restoration work was stripped and a new attempt was made. However, due to public outrage, this attempt was halted as the restorer had repainted all but three of the disciples faces.
Over the next couple of centuries, other minor attempts were made to restore it, but it wasnt until 1978 that a major restoration attempt was made, with modern methods, along with new understanding of the reactions of the elements to the piece. This restoration took around 20 years to complete and it too attracted controversy due to the brightness of the new colors and several forms had changed from the original. Summary, to this day, the last Supper remains one of the greatest legacies of da vinci. Despite the second-hand restorations, the piece is still amazing to see, and provides an inspired look into the genius of the great da vinci. It was also a painting that would inspire new artists to aspire to, in terms of perspective and presentation. It certainly was a turning point in art history that directed art onto a newer and more realistic path. Total Lifetime Grosses, domestic: 91,547,205.3, foreign: 4,523,302.7, worldwide: 96,070,507, domestic Summary. Opening weekend: 33,636,303 1 rank, 2,015 theaters, 16,693 average) of Total Gross:.7 view All 12 weekends, widest Release: 2,052 theaters, close Date: July 8, 2012. In Release: 80 days /.4 weeks.
The, last, things: Summary
No doubt, all would be thinking that they would never betray the mini messiah. The next group, it is likely that Judas is the one holding what appears to be a bag (perhaps of silver?). Behind him is likely peter, jesus number one disciple who appears angry at the news. And the other person is likely one of the younger apostles, as he appears to swoon. Many have suggested that this is Mary magdalene, perhaps shredder inspired by the famous da vinci code book. To the right of Christ, the next group of apostles appears to perhaps be questioning Christ as to the suggestion of betrayal, while the group on the far right is likely discussing loudly regarding the news. Around sixty years after da vinci had completed the piece, it started to deteriorate.
These perspective lines blend in with the ceiling and walls. The painting also makes us feel as if we too are a part. This formula has been copied and become the standard for symbolic paintings from then. The Story, the last Supper is the final meal Christ had with his disciples before he was arrested which ultimately crucified. The scene we are shown is when Christ tells his followers that he is to be betrayed and that he will be leaving them very soon. In the groups of three, we see the reactions from the apostles to the news. From the far left, we have the first tomosynthesis group who all look surprised.
the entire piece and we have a sense of asymmetrical symmetry as he is flanked by his disciples. There are thirteen people in all (including Christ) and we can see, presumably the figure of Judas Escariot to the right of Christ, as he was still present at the meal. Some have theorized that Mary magdalene was sitting to the left of Christ in the painting, but this is a contradiction since there had to be twelve disciples, and she was not one of them. It is interesting to note, that with Christ as the center piece, how he is in fact well framed by the doorway. This provides contrast between his figure and the outside, as well as bringing out eye to the most important figure on the piece. His arms, head and body form a triangle, as well as the space on the left hand side between him and the figure to his left. The disciples are also nicely arranged into groups of three along the length of the table. One interesting fact is that there are lines of perspective that radiate from Christs head, indicating that he is the focal point of the painting.
In essence, he was a renaissance man. Da vinci explored and delved into things which were many centuries ahead of him. He was born in 1452 near Vinci in Italy, and died in Amboise, near tours France in 1519. As one of the early renaissance men, he was largely underappreciated in Florence, birth place of the renaissance, and lived out his days under the appreciative arm of French King Francois. His most famous painting, the mona lisa stands proud amongst the collection of the louvre, along with many of his other works. The last Supper, the last Supper is among his most famous works. It is a giant fresco like painting on the side of a wall in a dining hall of a monastery.summary
The Illustrated, man, the, last
The last Supper, by leonardo da vinci, is one of thesis the most famous works of art in the world. It is a large fresco style painting on the wall of Santa maria delle Grazie, milan, Italy. It is not a true fresco because it was painted on a dry wall, instead of wet plaster. Unfortunately, because of the medium used, the work began to deteriorate fairly soon after it was painted, and so over the years numerous restoration attempts have been made to restore and preserve. Although it took over three years to complete, da vinci did not actually work on it continuously. No one knows the exact date of commencement due to lost and unreliable record-keeping. The Artist, leonardo da vinci was arguably one of the greatest men to have ever lived. He was an artist, scientist, architect, author, engineer, inventor, and humanist.